The books have been the subject of a number of legal proceedings, largely stemming either from claims by American Christian groups that the magic in the books promotes witchcraft among children, or from various conflicts over copyright and trademark infringements.
The books' immense popularity and high market value has led Rowling, her publishers, and film distributor Warner Bros. to take legal measures to protect their copyright, which have included banning the sale of Harry Potter imitations, targeting the owners of websites over the "Harry Potter" domain name, and suing author Nancy Stouffer to counter her accusations that Rowling had plagiarised her work.[87][88][89]
Various religious conservatives have claimed that the books promote witchcraft and are therefore unsuitable for children,[90] while a number of critics have criticised the books for promoting various political agendas.[91][92] Her revelation that the character Dumbledore was homosexual has increased the political controversies surrounding the series.[93]
The books' immense popularity and high market value has led Rowling, her publishers, and film distributor Warner Bros. to take legal measures to protect their copyright, which have included banning the sale of Harry Potter imitations, targeting the owners of websites over the "Harry Potter" domain name, and suing author Nancy Stouffer to counter her accusations that Rowling had plagiarised her work.[87][88][89]
Various religious conservatives have claimed that the books promote witchcraft and are therefore unsuitable for children,[90] while a number of critics have criticised the books for promoting various political agendas.[91][92] Her revelation that the character Dumbledore was homosexual has increased the political controversies surrounding the series.[93]
ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น